Kakapo

The Safety Reputation Gap: Cities Travellers Fear (But Shouldn't)

Reputation and reality often disagree. We paired each of 131 major cities' general reputation with its actual 2026 Kakapo Safety Index score. The result: a lot of "scary" places are objectively safe for the typical traveller — and a few household-name "safe" cities rank lower than their reputation implies.

By the Kakapo Editorial Team · Updated 2026-07-03 · Methodology · Companion to the 2026 Travel Safety Index
Key findings — free to cite

Of the 32 cities in our set with a "dangerous" public reputation, 41% actually score in the Caution band or safer on Kakapo's 0–100 index — the fear outpaces the data.

Underrated: fearsome reputation, genuinely safe score

These cities carry a "dangerous" reputation in popular perception, yet their 2026 composite scores tell a different story. None of this means switch off your common sense — every city has neighbourhoods and scams to mind — but the blanket fear isn't supported by the data.

CityScoreBandGlobal rank
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia85/100Very Safe#42/131
Jerusalem, Israel84/100Very Safe#46/131
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia84/100Very Safe#47/131
Bucharest, Romania80/100Good#68/131
Sofia, Bulgaria79/100Good#81/131
Bangkok, Thailand76/100Caution#87/131
Belgrade, Serbia76/100Caution#90/131
Quito, Ecuador76/100Caution#92/131
Marseille, France73/100Caution#96/131
Phnom Penh, Cambodia73/100Caution#97/131
Casablanca, Morocco73/100Caution#98/131
Istanbul, Turkey72/100Caution#99/131
Reputation lags reality. A city's safety reputation is often years out of date or driven by a single news cycle. The composite score reflects current advisories, crime data, and healthcare access — not yesterday's headline.

Where reputation outpaces the data

The flip side is gentler: these cities have reassuring reputations and are still safe — but they score a little lower than their pristine image implies, usually on night-safety or petty crime. Worth knowing, not worth worrying about.

CityScoreBandGlobal rank
Vancouver, Canada81/100Good#61/131
Rotterdam, Netherlands82/100Good#54/131
Vilnius, Lithuania82/100Good#59/131
Bratislava, Slovakia83/100Very Safe#49/131
Amsterdam, Netherlands85/100Very Safe#39/131
Tallinn, Estonia85/100Very Safe#41/131
Stockholm, Sweden86/100Very Safe#31/131
Antwerp, Belgium86/100Very Safe#34/131
Hamburg, Germany86/100Very Safe#35/131
Cologne, Germany86/100Very Safe#36/131

How we classify reputation

Each city is tagged with a general reputation — "safe", "popular", or "scary" — reflecting how it tends to be perceived by travellers, independent of its score. The score is the 2026 Kakapo Safety Index: a 0–100 composite of national travel advisories from seven governments, crime data, healthcare access, and a dedicated night-safety measure. The "gap" is simply where the two disagree. Full weighting at https://kakapo.travel/about/methodology; every data feed is listed at https://kakapo.travel/data-sources.

Cite this study

This analysis is free to cite in journalism, research, or content — all we ask is a link back. Copy the attribution below:

Ready-to-use citation
Kakapo Editorial Team (2026). The Safety Reputation Gap: Cities Travellers Fear (But Shouldn't). Kakapo. https://kakapo.travel/blog/safety-reputation-gap-2026

Writing a travel-safety story? We give journalists and researchers custom data pulls at no cost — the full reputation-vs-score table, a specific city or region, or solo-female and night-safety cuts. Email [email protected] and we usually reply the same day.

Kakapo publishes real safety scores for every destination, drawing on national travel advisories, local crime data, healthcare infrastructure, and night-safety measures. Independent editorial — no advertiser influence on scores. Contact: [email protected].