Kakapo
The World's Weakest Link
Data study

The World's Weakest Link

We averaged all four safety sub-scores across 1,109 cities to find the kind of safety the planet is collectively worst at. One dimension came out lowest — and it's a city's single weakest point four times out of five: night safety, a global average of just 68.9/100.

Key findings — free to cite

Averaged across all 1,109 scored cities, night safety is the single dimension the world is worst at — a global mean of just 68.9/100, nearly ten points below healthcare (78.8) — and it's a city's single weakest link 80.5% of the time.

  • The four global averages line up cleanly: night 68.9, personal 70.7, transport 74.7, healthcare 78.8. The gap between the best-covered dimension and the worst is about 10 points.
  • It's not close. In 80.5% of cities the after-dark score is the lowest of the four — versus 12.4% for transport, 3.8% for personal safety and just 3.3% for healthcare. Whatever else a city gets right, the dark is usually where it's thinnest.
  • The pattern holds on every continent, but the floor varies enormously: night safety averages 49.5 in Africa and 53.6 in South America, versus 75.7 in Europe and 82.6 in Oceania.
  • The takeaway for travellers is simple and portable: the same place is a different place at night. If you plan around one risk, plan around the hours after dark — it's the dimension most likely to be a destination's soft spot, wherever you go.
  • Computed from Kakapo's four safety sub-scores across every scored city — the only travel index that breaks safety into night, personal, transport and healthcare and publishes each one.

The planet's soft spot is the dark

Every Kakapo city score is built from four separate sub-scores: how safe it is after dark, everyday personal-crime risk, getting around, and medical care. Most of our studies ask which cities are strong or weak. This one asks a bigger question: of those four kinds of safety, which is humanity collectively worst at? We took all 1,109 scored cities — one row per city, largest population, every sub-score present — and averaged each dimension across the entire planet. One number came out clearly lowest.

Safety sub-scoreGlobal average% of cities where it's the weakest link
Night safety
How safe the streets feel after dark
68.980.5%
Personal safety
Everyday crime risk to a visitor by day
70.73.8%
Transport safety
Roads, transit and getting around
74.712.4%
Healthcare
Medical care if you're hurt or fall ill
78.83.3%
Two different measures, same winner: night safety has both the lowest global average and is most often a city's single weakest sub-score. A dimension could be low on average yet rarely the worst thing about any one place; night safety is low and the local weak point four times out of five. That's what makes it the world's weakest link rather than just a low number.

Why after-dark is where cities fall down

It fits what the streets actually feel like. Daytime pulls in crowds, open shops, working transit and visible policing — the natural guardians that keep public space safe. After dark most of that thins out at once: fewer people, shuttered frontages, quieter stops, longer waits. A street that's completely ordinary at 2pm can be the sketchiest part of the trip at 2am, and that shift happens almost everywhere. It's why night safety, not crime in general or bad hospitals, is the dimension most cities are weakest on.

The same weakness, a very different floor

Night safety is the weakest link on every continent — but "weakest" starts from wildly different baselines. Here's the global soft spot broken down by region, worst first.

RegionNight-safety averageCities
Africa49.571
South America53.666
North America65.7241
Asia69.1289
Europe75.7350
Oceania82.643

An after-dark score in the low 50s (much of Africa and South America) and one in the low 80s (Oceania) describe genuinely different experiences of the same street at midnight. The dimension the world is worst at is also the one where geography matters most.

What to do with this

If you take one habit from this study, make it the night check. Before you book, look at a destination's after-dark score specifically, not just its overall number — because the overall figure is buoyed by the three dimensions the world is better at, and the night score is the one most likely to be the real risk. Then plan around it: licensed rides over walking late, staying where the streets stay busy, treating the small hours as a different city than the one you saw at lunch.

How we measured it

We took every city Kakapo scores — one row per city (largest population), NYC boroughs excluded, all four sub-scores present — for 1,109 cities in total. For each of the four sub-scores (night, personal, transport, healthcare) we computed the plain global average across all cities, and separately counted how often each was a given city's single lowest sub-score. The regional table averages the night sub-score by continent (cities with no country attached are excluded from that cut only). Full weighting is at https://kakapo.travel/about/methodology. Scores are comparative model estimates, not official ratings.

Cite this study

Free to cite in journalism, research or content — all we ask is a link back. Copy the attribution below:

Ready-to-use citation
Kakapo Editorial Team (2026). The World's Weakest Link: The Kind of Safety the Planet Is Worst At. Kakapo. https://kakapo.travel/blog/worlds-weakest-link-2026

Writing about travel safety, nightlife or a specific region? We give journalists custom data pulls at no cost — the full sub-score averages, a single region's night-safety table, or a city-by-city after-dark breakdown. Email [email protected] and we usually reply the same day.

Free to cite & embed

Republish the graphic below — the image links back here automatically. Or pull the raw numbers from the open dataset.

Kakapo publishes real safety scores for every destination, drawing on national travel advisories, local crime data, healthcare infrastructure, and night-safety measures. Kakapo Studies is our research imprint — independent editorial, no advertiser influence on scores. Contact: [email protected].